Ohio's structure shows
- Deputies and their employees are not state employees
- Deputies carry payroll and related employer obligations
- Deputy-provided sites supply and maintain the facility
- The state sets staffing, service, security, and facility rules
The California benefit case
California must test and measure each benefit
CALDRA wants qualified private deputies to run selected DMV offices, as they do in Ohio. The goals are lower state costs, shorter visits, more access, and faster service improvements.
The scale of the opportunity
California DMV reports 214 facilities and about 8,299 employees. It also reports 6,390 business partner sites. These figures were current on January 1, 2026.
CALDRA's plan goes further. Private deputy registrars would run selected offices under a state contract. They would take on approved staff, site, and daily operating costs.
Review California DMV statisticsOhio's structure shows
California could gain
Four benefits to prove
Ohio shows how the structure can work. California should publish its own cost forecast and service goals before deciding how far to go.
Compare the state's full cost per transaction with the deputy model. Include state oversight and the cost of the change.
Track wait time, service time, repeat visits, and the time spent traveling to an office.
Set clear goals for sites, hours, rural and urban coverage, disability access, and language access.
Track use, uptime, security, and completed work. Report how much state technology spending the model avoids.
Official operating evidence
California Department of Motor Vehicles
Reports 214 facilities, about 8,299 employees, and 6,390 business partner sites as of January 1, 2026.
State of Ohio
Explains contractor status, payroll duties, staff, sites, insurance, training, service rules, and state enforcement.
Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles
Explains competitive selection, approved services, and site criteria, including deputy-provided locations where the operator supplies the site.
California Department of Motor Vehicles
Provides the department's field-office wait-time and performance reporting context.
Continue the conversation
Ohio provides an official example of competitive appointments and state-authorized services. California would still need its own law.
Review the Ohio model